🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.